By: shortncu

shortncu — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:07:42 +0000

By: Will R

Will R — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:55:35 +0000

“C” more chips

By: True That

True That — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:02:35 +0000

I would have to say person C. But, it depends on if person B bets or checks out their hand. If person B bets first and doesn’t check, then he will win. It is all about betting at the right time…

By: m203

m203 — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:27:37 +0000

It would be 1st A 2nd B and 3rd C
regardless of chip count they were all-in so chips became mute. Since A had KKQQ10 they won
Since B had QQ1010A(higher kicker wins the hand of B,C)
Since C had QQ10105(lower kicker lesser hand loses to B)
If A had not had “cowboys” B would have won correct? thus B would have beat C. This being said C would have beaten A without the “cowboys” they would have taken the second side pot and B taking the main pot leaving A with third side pot or what his opponents could not match.
Pot 1(everyone matching B’s all-in)150
Pot 2(A matching C’s all-in)100
Pot 3(A being the only one automaticly wins this pot)100 of course there would only be a third pot if A went all-in first.
A(without K’s) 100 chips
B(without A having K’s) 150 chips
C(without A having K’s) 100 chips

Comments on: Who Would Win 2nd Prize In A Texas Holdem Poker Tournament In This Situation?

By: shortncu

By: Will R

By: True That

By: m203